Legal Opinion
Baumann v. Baumann
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
Plaintiff’s husband, married and domiciled in New York, went to Yucatan, Mexico, in 1924, and there obtained from an administrative officer, known as the director general of civil register, a certificate of divorce purporting to divorce him from plaintiff. No notice of the proceeding was given to plaintiff, a resident of New York, and she did not appear therein. This divorce was void. (Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14; Haddock v. Haddock, 201 id. 562; Cheever v. Wilson, 9 Wall. 108; Bell v. Bell, 157 N. Y. 719; affd., 181 U. S. 175; Olmsted v. Olmsted, 216 id. 386.) In 1926 the defendants,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Cheever v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Schuyler v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- O'Dea v. . O'DeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henry v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Baumann v. BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Drew v. HobbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Ufa Films, Inc. v. Ufa Eastern Division Distribution, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1929
- Connors v. ConnorsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.