Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. Conrail
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 22, 1982No. 82 CIV. 5689 (LBS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, 1 passengers on Conrail’s Harlem-Hudson line, filed suit in small claims court alleging breach of contract and tortious misconduct with respect to Conrad’s operation of its passenger service in June and July of 1982. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), defendant had this action removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs, in asking that the case be remanded to small claims court, aver that the § 1441(a) requirement of original federal jurisdiction has not been met. Plaintiff Zimmerman also requests…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lucille Dorothy Peltier v. Robert Ernest PeltierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Gorman v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
- Coleman v. Alcolac, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Johansen v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Application of Prudential Securities Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.