Legal Opinion
Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit Appeals
California Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1967No. S. F. 21914Published
1Opinion of the Court
66 Cal.2d 34 (1967)
423 P.2d 824
56 Cal. Rptr. 672
RUSSIAN HILL IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Docket No. S.F. 21914.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
February 24, 1967.
Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, Robert A. Kenealey, Deputy City Attorney, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, John B. Bates, Noble K. Gregory and Thomas E. Feeney for Defendants and Appellants.
Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Caspar W. Weinberger and M. Laurence Popofsky for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
TOB…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ziffrin, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.