Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. L.J. Lewis Enterprises, Unpublished Decision (9-28-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2001No. Accelerated Case No. 2000-T-0052Unpublished

1Dissent

For the reasons that follow, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which concludes that it was appropriate for the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of appellee on appellant's negligence claim involving an injury to his right hand.

Pursuant to Civ.R. 56, summary judgment is appropriate when: (1) there is no genuine issue of material fact; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the non-moving party, said party being entitled to have the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Aglinsky v. Cleveland Builders Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Carver v. the Township of DeerfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Lennon v. NeilOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Ellis v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API