Legal Opinion

State v. Glade

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 1983No. 10-80-08390; CA A22927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*725ROSSMAN, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized during a series of warrantless searches. ORS 138.060(3). We reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

On September 2, 1980, at approximately 2 p.m., a man and a woman approached Fejer, an air freight agent for United Airlines in Los Angeles, to deliver a wrapped package to be sent to Eugene by air freight. They told Fejer that the package contained baby clothes. He informed the couple that they could save about $30 by sending the package through the post office across the street. The couple, however, insisted on shipping…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. People v. AdlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LumanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. KelseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. MolatoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State v. GladeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API