State v. BROSKY
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.
The State of Florida seeks to reverse a trial court order dismissing charges against Paul Brosky. We reverse and remand for reinstatement of those charges.
The trial court’s sua sponte dismissal of the charges was an abuse of discretion, no matter how frustrated (and rightly so) the trial judge was with both sides over the progress of this matter. Florida case law clearly provides that, in the absence of statute or motion to dismiss, the decision whether to prosecute or to dismiss charges is a determination to be made by solely the State. State v. Bonnett, 985 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cleveland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- State v. S.M.F.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. LoweDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. BradenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- State v. ClevelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barnett v. AntonacciDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- CITY OF HOLLYWOOD v. ANTHONY HAYNIEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- City of Miami Beach v. Adalberto CosmeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- City of Miami Beach v. Victor GuytonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- Conley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Charlotte County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.