Legal Opinion

Virgil State Bank v. Miller

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1915No. File No. 3711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County. Hon. Alva E. Taylor, Judge. Action by the Virgil State Bank against S. M. Miller, upon promissory notes (a check being involved in another branch of the case). From that part of the judgment which was in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGate'S, J.

This appeal, -No. 371 x, was prosecuted from a portion of the judgment rendered in the above-entitled action, and from an order denying a new trial. The first cause of action was based upon a promissory note given to the plaintiff for $1,300, dated May 2, 1911, and due August 1, 1911, signed by the de- ' fendant, by ,'C. B. Miller, his son. The second cause of action was based upon a note for $400, similarly signed, given to the Bank of Alpena, dated February 18, 1911, and due October 1, 1911, which was transferred to plaintiff. The third cause of action was based upon certain checks drawn…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Virgil State Bank v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Virgil State Bank v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API