Jackson v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT TAMMY JACKSON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:20-CV-10-GFVT-MAS ) ETHICON, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION & ORDER This matter arises out of a subpoena served on non-party law firm Hughes & Coleman, PLLC seeking materials related to Plaintiff Tammy Jackson’s consultation with the firm prior to initiation of this case. Hughes & Coleman resists the document requests on privilege grounds, and Defendants Ethicon, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, “Ethicon”) move to compel subpoena…