Legal Opinion

One to One Interactive, LLC v. Landrith

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 21, 2010No. 09-P-178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

Former founders of an Internet start-up company, One to One Interactive, LLC (OTO or company), sued each other for claims arising out of internal disputes and the eventual demise of their closely-held corporation. 2 At issue in this appeal are claims by the plaintiff, David K. Landrith, that the other founders caused OTO to renege on his stock redemption agreement. 3 The jury awarded him $4.95 million for breach of fiduciary duty and intentional interference with a contract. We remand the case for a new trial on damages only.

1. Background. Landrith, Ian Karnell, and Jeremi Karnell were…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Blackstone v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Suominen v. Goodman Industrial Equities Management Group, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  2. Rivera v. Club Caravan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. Christakis v. Jeanne D'Arc Credit UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. In re LeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  5. Integrated Pharm., Inc. v. Chatterjee (In re Chatterjee)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API