Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 22, 1980No. PP-386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Miller was convicted of burglary and brings this appeal. We affirm although several issues merit discussion.

Appellant urges the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that the state had to prove the burglary occurred at “approximately 4:15 a. m.”, as stated in its bill of particulars. Appellant’s alibi witness, his roommate, stated that when he returned home at 3:30 a. m. on October 26, 1977, he found appellant with an injured leg and took him to the hospital. Appellant testified he injured his leg earlier the evening of October 25,1977, while climbing the fuel oil drums…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. State v. BeamonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonnough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API