Legal Opinion

United States v. Henry Kenneth Wangrow

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1991No. 90-1833NEPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Henry Kenneth Wangrow appeals his convictions for postal burglary in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115, and interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. We affirm.

The facts of the crimes themselves are largely irrelevant to this appeal. We note, however, that this case began on January 31, 1967, when Omaha police arrested three men, Henry Wangrow, Mark Murphy, and Daniel Czajkowski, for burglarizing a United States Post Office that same day in Omaha, using a vehicle stolen in Chicago, Illinois. The government did not bring Wangrow to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Henry Kenneth Wangrow v. United States of America (Two Cases). Daniel Edmund Czajkowski and Mark Edward Murphy v. United States of America (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. PomeroyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hakeem v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Hakeem v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Jose SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. State v. KutkutOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. United States v. ReumayrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API