Legal Opinion

Ull v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 1993No. 92-2341PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

At arraignment, the county court appointed the public defender to represent Ull, an indigent, on DUI and related offenses. Because the charges carried the possibility of a prison sentence, this ruling was not only correct, but constitutionally required. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972). On the date set for trial, however, the assistant state attorney announced, and the trial judge certified that no jail sentence would be sought or imposed. On that basis, the county court then purported *929to discharge or “dis-appoint” the public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Roswall v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. UllSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API