Ull v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
At arraignment, the county court appointed the public defender to represent Ull, an indigent, on DUI and related offenses. Because the charges carried the possibility of a prison sentence, this ruling was not only correct, but constitutionally required. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972). On the date set for trial, however, the assistant state attorney announced, and the trial judge certified that no jail sentence would be sought or imposed. On that basis, the county court then purported *929to discharge or “dis-appoint” the public…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roswall v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. UllSupreme Court of Florida · 1994