Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1932No. 13405Published

1Dissent

Being unable to agree with the opinion of Acting Associate Justice Smith and dissenting therefrom, I adopt as my dissenting opinion the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Cothran when this cause was first heard in the Supreme Court. His opinion will be reported and is as follows:

"This action commenced on April 6, 1929, was brought to recover damages in the sum of $25,000.00 for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff as a result of a collision between a passenger train of the defendant railroad company, operated by its engineer and codefendant, William Smith, between…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API