Legal Opinion

Hampton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1931No. A-7670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county of the crime of rape in the first degree, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for 30 years.

The defendant contends that the state’s evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty.

The evidence of the state was sufficient to establish that the defendant, a negro, about 38 years of age, committed rape upon the person of Willie Mae Martin, a 12 year old negro girl.

The defendant next contends that the court erred in permitting the state to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tudor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Clifton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API