State v. Woods
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The question is whether Woods has suffered double jeopardy because of a municipal court conviction and a subsequent district court conviction.
Woods’ district court conviction for aggravated assault was affirmed. State v. Woods, 82 N.M. 449, 483 P.2d 504 (Ct.App.1971). The denial of post-conviction relief, with the exception of the double jeopardy issue, was affirmed. Woods v. State, 84 N.M. 248, 501 P.2d 692 (Ct.App.1972). The post-conviction proceeding was remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing. That evidentiary hearing has been held. The trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ReidNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Woods v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. WoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. WoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WatkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974