Moler v. State

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Michael L. Moler appeals his conviction for Murder, 1 a felony, challenging sufficiency of the evidence. Specifically, Moler argues that his convietion may not stand because no witnesses testified that Moler was sane during the commission of his crime. Because we are constrained by our supreme court's holding in Barany v. State, we affirm.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the verdict are that Moler was living with Neil Wright and Neil's mother, Nina Wright. Both Neil and Nina knew that Moler had schizophrenia, but both also knew that Moler functioned…