Legal Opinion

Martin v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order *675are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

On January 12, 1983, as he was leaving the premises owned by the defendant third-party plaintiff, the plaintiff Warren Martin slipped on an accumulated substance on the floor. The plaintiff was employed by the third-party defendant to provide security…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Lopez v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Levy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Martin v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API