Legal Opinion
Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 1990No. 89-1290PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
This is the second appeal in a case arising out of a claim for worker’s compensation. The Hearing Examiner originally awarded benefits, relying in part on a doctor’s report filed after the conclusion of the administrative hearing. The Director reversed, ruling that D.C.Code § 36-320(c) (1981) forbids the Hearing Examiner from admitting post-hearing evidence absent “unusual circumstances.” Upon appeal this court remanded the case because the Director failed to consider the agency’s own regulation governing the reopening of evidentiary hearings, 7 DCMR § 223.4 (1986). See…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lee v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cities of Campbell and Thayer, Missouri v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Power & Light Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles P. Young Co. v. District of Columbia DepartMent of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- District of Columbia Preservation League v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Georgetown University Hospital v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brenda Johnson v. D.C. Dept. of Emp't Servs. / Federal Express Corp. & Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Johnson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.