Legal Opinion
Freeman & Co. v. Bolt
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 1998No. 23938PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.
Bolt Construction Company (Bolt) appeals from the district court’s decision on a bench trial regarding disputes over a residence which Bolt built for Jack and Jennifer Kulm. The parties disagreed over how to properly calculate and prove “cost” for a “cost plus” contract and whether the charges levied for certain “extra” and “additional” work were correct. Each party prevailed on some of their respective claims, but the district court concluded that the Kulms were the overall prevailing party and awarded them a significant percentage of their attorney fees.
We affirm the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- N. L. Wymard and George L. Stark, Receivers of Kemmel & Co., Inc., Debtor v. McCloskey & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Bott v. Idaho State Building AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Gilbert v. City of CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bumgarner v. BumgarnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Arthur v. Shoshone CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- Olmstead Construction, Inc. v. Otter Creek Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019