Legal Opinion

Beckett v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1925No. 16033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

Perry-man Cudjo is named as one of the plaintiffs in error in the petition in error, but the appeal was dismissed as to him. The defendant in error will be referred to herein as plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error as defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

Perryman Cudjo was a new-born Seminole freedman allottee, to whom was allotted the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 26, township 7 north, range 6 east, in Seminole county. 1-Iis father and mother were King Cudjo and Dafney Cudjo. Dafney Cudjo was his legal guardian. On the 22nd of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Bond & Mortgage Co. v. KeaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Farmers State Bank of Ingersoll v. Midland Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Hastings v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Dean v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API