Legal Opinion

United States v. Sebert

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 16, 2018No. : 17-2771Published

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The petition for rehearing by the panel is also denied.

Judge Kelly did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. GRASZ, Circuit Judge, concurring with the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

For the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in United States v. Sebert , 899 F.3d 639, 641-42 (8th Cir. 2018) (Grasz, J., concurring), I find the Petition for Rehearing En Banc to be based on sound legal reasoning. However, in light of the Government's Response, the Petition does not present a question of exceptional…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Jonathan SebertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API