Legal Opinion

People v. Bailey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 6, 2007No. 2-05-1260PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant, George Bailey, appeals from his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. On appeal, defendant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to quash his arrest and suppress evidence found pursuant to a search of the vehicle in which defendant was riding just before his arrest. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Defendant was charged in connection with an incident in which police, who arrested defendant after learning during a vehicle stop that defendant had an outstanding arrest warrant, searched the car in which…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allen v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. People v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. PresleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. People v. KiefelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. Lutkauskas v. RickerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API