Legal Opinion

Philbrick v. eNom, Inc.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 22, 2009No. 2009 DNH 010; Civil 07-215-JLPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge.

In this intellectual property lawsuit, defendant eNom, Inc., a provider of domain name registration services based in Bellevue, Washington, moves for summary judgment on claims arising out of eNom’s handling of domain names confusingly similar to the plaintiffs’ trade name, “Phil-brick’s Sports.” The plaintiffs allege that eNom’s handling of the domain names, which include “philbricksports.com,” “philbricksports.net,” and “philbrickssports.net,” violated the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”), Pub. L. No. 106-113, app. I, sec. 3001,…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zinner v. OlenychDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  2. Puerto Rico Medical Emergency Group, Inc. v. Iglesia Episcopal Puertorriqueña, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
  3. Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
  4. West v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
  5. Allen v. IM Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API