Legal Opinion

Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. Keith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 11, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE PENDING ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. The trustees in a mortgage of the Kentucky Central ■ Railroad filed their bill in the Circuit Court of the United States for Kentucky to foreclose the mortgage, and the court appointed a receiver.

Read the full summary

ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE PENDING ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. The trustees in a mortgage of the Kentucky Central ■ Railroad filed their bill in the Circuit Court of the United States for Kentucky to foreclose the mortgage, and the court appointed a receiver. The defendants in error intervened, setting forth that they were engaged in the business of buying and selling live stock, and that they were the proprietors of stock yards near said railroad, and adjoining the stock yards of the Covington Stock-Yards Company, the plaintiff in error;…

1Opinion of the Court

.Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The .qualified acceptance of the bond given oh this appeal shows that the .judge who.took it considered the security only sufficient for a stay of. the execution of that part of the decree appealed from, which was for the payment of money. Under these circumstances the appeal only operates ■ as a supersedeas to that extent., As the appeal was taken within sixty days after the rendition- of the decree, Mr. Justice Matthews, the justice of this court, assigned to the Sixth Circuit, has power, under § 1007 of the Revised Statutes, to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aetna Ins. v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Whorley v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Martínez v. CrosasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1919
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API