Legal Opinion

In re Doty

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 8, 1935No. 939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowen, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Section 75 (s), 11 USCA § 203 (s) provides: “Any farmer failing to obtain the acceptance of a majority in number and amount of all creditors whose claims' are affected by a composition or extension proposal, or if he feels aggrieved by the composition or extension, may amend his petition or answer asking to be adjudged a bankrupt. * * * ”

Under section 75 (s), .par. (1), 11 USCA § 203 (s) (1), it is provided: “Upon such a request being made in the petition or answer, at the time of the first hearing, appraisers shall be designated and appointed. * * *” And in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re McMurrayDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1934
  2. In re WilkinDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1934
  3. In Re PlumerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1935
  4. In re RiceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. In re WeirDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API