Legal Opinion

Miller v. Murdock

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1990No. 89-52PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Russell Eugene Miller (Miller), personal representative of the estate of his son, John Scott Miller, appeals from a jury verdict for defendant Charles A. Murdock (Murdock), personal representative of his son, William R. “Billy” Murdock. This wrongful death action arises from a single vehicle accident which killed all three youths in the vehicle, a pickup truck.

Miller presents five issues in his appeal, and Murdock responds with four. Mur-dock’s first issue controls our result. He argues that the trial court lacked authority to extend the time for filing of motions for new trial or judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. DS v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Russell Eady, a Minor, by Lillian Becker, His Mother and Next Friend, and Lillian Becker v. Otto R. FoerderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Plymale v. DonnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Paxton Resources, L.L.C. v. BrannamanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. Stone v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ruppenthal v. State Ex Rel. Economic Development & Stabilization BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API