Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lank v. Steiner

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 24, 1966Published

1DissentHerrmann, Justice

(dissenting) : I would reverse on the grounds that the undisputed facts and testimony establish that a fiduciary relation existed between Edmund F. Steiner and Elsie L. Steiner, his wife, on the one hand, and the latter’s father and mother, John C. and Alena Lank, on the other, regarding the affairs of H. R. Phillips, Inc.; that by reason of such relation there is a presumption of invalidity of the stock options here in controversy; and that the Steiners have failed to overcome that presumption.

The following facts were established by uncontroverted testimony and stand undisputed:

John C. Lank…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. The Katingo HadjipateraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Eways v. Reading Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Arthur L. Johnson and Marjorie Johnson, a Partnership Doing Business as All-State School of DrivingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. Lehmann v. AchesonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API