Legal Opinion

Yeldell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1959No. 2393PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for simple assault. 1 The sole error discussed in appellant’s brief is the refusal of the trial judge to declare a mistrial when the arresting officer made reference on two occasions to appellant’s “parole officer.” The circumstances surrounding the alleged error were as follows:

On cross-examination, defendant’s counsel asked the officer whether defendant had not denied that the assault took place. According to the agreed statement of proceedings and evidence, the officer answered:

“Why, yes, he did but the denial took place after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chichester Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  2. Brooks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ManningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Baldi v. NimzakDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Saunders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API