Yeldell v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for simple assault. 1 The sole error discussed in appellant’s brief is the refusal of the trial judge to declare a mistrial when the arresting officer made reference on two occasions to appellant’s “parole officer.” The circumstances surrounding the alleged error were as follows:
On cross-examination, defendant’s counsel asked the officer whether defendant had not denied that the assault took place. According to the agreed statement of proceedings and evidence, the officer answered:
“Why, yes, he did but the denial took place after the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chichester Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Brooks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ManningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Baldi v. NimzakDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Saunders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959