Legal Opinion

(2008)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided October 3, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

You have asked for our opinion whether a State's Attorney or other State agency may charge the Office of the Public Defender "processing" or other fees for producing discovery in cases involving indigent defendants.

In our opinion, a State's Attorney or other State agency may not charge a criminal defendant for the cost of providing access to, or copies of, written discovery provided pursuant to the Maryland Rules. An agency may charge for copying discovery materials as an accommodation to a defendant when the rules do not require that the party making discovery provide a copy. In addition, an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Benson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Faulk v. STATE'S ATTORNEY FOR HARFORD CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API