Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Weigandt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 1984No. A8010-05643; CA A24652PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is a personal injury case in which plaintiff, the victim of an automobile accident, and a liability insurance company dispute whether and to what extent the company, in paying a settlement to plaintiff, may offset either (1) the amount it has already advanced to plaintiff or (2) the amount it has reimbursed plaintiffs own insurer for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. The trial court held that the advances could be offset, but the PIP reimbursement could not. Both parties appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiff was seriously injured when his car collided with one driven by defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SommerholderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. IFA Ins. Co. v. WaittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Hanover Ins. Co. v. LewisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Delcastillo v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Staiger v. BurkhartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Edwards v. Bonneville Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API