Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrews

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 16, 1993No. ACM 29547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DIXON, Chief Judge:

Appellant stands convicted by general court-martial, contrary to his pleas, of assault with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm and burglary. His approved sentence consists of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 8 years, total forfeitures and reduction to E-l. We find error prejudicial to the appellant’s substantive rights and set aside the findings and sentence.

Appellant raises nine assignments of error. In view of our disposition, however, only one requires discussion. It is:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED TO THE SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF THE…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. BrowersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. DanielsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. MenokenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GrantU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. CannonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API