Legal Opinion
EM LTD. v. the Republic of Argentina
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 2010No. 03 Civ. 2507(TPG), 03 Civ. 8845(TPG), 05 Civ. 2434(TPG), 06 Civ. 6646(TPG), 06 Civ. 7792(TPG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS P. GRIESA, District Judge.
In September 2006 the two plaintiffs in the above cases moved for provisional relief with respect to approximately $100 million deposited by the Central Bank of Argentina (“BCRA”) in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”). The purpose was to secure expected judgments, and to secure a judgment actually entered, against the Republic of Argentina in cases based on the Republic’s default on its bond indebtedness.
The motions are granted.
As of September 2006, EM had obtained a judgment in case 03 Civ. 2507, dated October 27, 2003. Subsequent to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- NML Capital, Ltd. v. Banco Central De La República ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- EM Ltd. v. Banco Central de la República ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- In re 650 Fifth Avenue & Related PropertiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- General Star National Insurance v. Administrate Asigurarilor De StatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Theatre Row Phase II Associates v. H & I Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011