Legal Opinion
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1923No. Civ. No. 4708PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
matter comes before us upon a motion to dismiss the appeal of the defendant Herbert Simmons. Notice of said motion was duly served upon the attorney of record for said appellant.
It appears from the certificate of the county clerk ■ of the city and county of San Francisco, filed herein in support of the motion, that a money judgment of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco in favor of plaintiff and against defendants herein was duly made and entered on the fourteenth day of April, 1923; that notice of entry of said judgment was duly served upon the attorney for the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. NovotnyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. Berkeley Chiropractic CollegeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Robbins v. FungeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Starkweather v. EddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.