Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Neuhausen v. Nachtsheim

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1992No. 91-348Published

1DissentJustice Trieweiler

I dissent from the majority opinion.

The Department of Administration had a clear legal duty to pay retirement benefits to Patricia Neuhausen, and the statutes relied upon by the majority in no way prohibited it from doing so.

The Department’s duty arose from the Amended Final Decree of Dissolution entered by the Flathead County District Court on November 28, 1990. That decree dissolved the marriage of Patricia Neuhausen and Martin Neuhausen, divided the Montana Highway Patrol Retirement benefits equally between the parties, and ordered the administrators of the retirement funds to issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sowell v. Teachers' Retirement SystemMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re the Marriage of ButlerMontana Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API