Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1992No. A91A1652PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

Arthur Boehm and Harold Downs brought suit against Joseph Proctor and John Acuff seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages for the defendants’ alleged violation of subdivision restrictive covenants. Upon the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted the defendants’ motion and denied that of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appeal.

The material facts are not in dispute. Each appellant owns a home in Oakwood Estates Subdivision, Unit II, in Catoosa County, which was platted and developed in 1975. At that time, the developer recorded certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Voyles v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. StathamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Holbrook v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Garland v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Nakis v. CrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Westpark Walk Owners, LLC v. Stewart Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API