Legal Opinion

Office of Professional Regulation v. McElroy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 27, 2003No. 02-192PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 1. This is an appeal from an order by the Real Estate Commission (R.E.C.) reprimanding appellant, David McElroy, for engaging in conduct as a real estate broker without a license. After an appellate officer reversed the Commission’s decision to reprimand, the State appealed to the Washington Superior Court pursuant to 3 V.S.A. § 130a(c). The superior court reinstated the Commission’s reprimand, and this appeal followed.

¶ 2. McElroy contends that the stipulated facts do not support a finding that he was engaged as a real estate broker,in a continuous course of conduct within this state…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ramon Becerra-Jimenez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Liberty Coins v. David GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Devers-Scott v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. In re LakatosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Devers-Scott v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API