Legal Opinion

Norstrom v. Wahl

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 1930No. 4288PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

It is important to classify the proceeding here — whether for civil or criminal contempt, or both — since the order for payment to the United States of part of the fine imposed can be supported only in a proceeding for criminal contempt, and for payment of part to the plaintiff only in one for a civil contempt. In considering the question, one turns to the exhaustive discussion of civil and criminal contempts as found in Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U. S. 418, 31 S. Ct. 492, 55 L. Ed. 797, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 874. The opinion, from page 440 of 221 U. S., 31…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Christensen Engineering Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  4. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
  5. Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1886

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Laurie Connolly D/B/A Brindar Designs v. J.T. Ventures and John LangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. In Re FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Brooks v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Brooks)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API