Legal Opinion

People v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 17, 1989No. 87SA471PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

The People have filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 seeking review of the trial court’s order granting a motion filed by the defendant, Donald Eugene Thompson, to suppress evidence of contraband seized from Thompson’s residence. 1 The People argue that in the circumstances of this case exigent circumstances justified a decision by police officials to enter and search a private residence without first obtaining a search warrant. We agree with the People’s argument.

On March 4, 1987, at 3:30 a.m., Aurora Police Department Officers Michael Achziger, Mark…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Thompson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Gatewood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  5. McCall v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. People v. KluhsmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People v. HebertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API