Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanders

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 17, 1993No. ACMR 9200993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CREAN, Senior Judge:

The appellant was found guilty, in accordance with her pleas, by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial of absence without authority, false swearing, and wrongful use of cocaine, in violation of Articles 86, 134, and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 934, and 912a (1982 and Supp. Y 1987). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 105 days.

The appellant was placed in pretrial confinement three separate times. The first time was from 18 to 28 February 1992.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GrahamU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. TaylorU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API