Legal Opinion

Garnier v. Poway Unified School District

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 14, 2021No. 3:17-cv-02215Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER GARNIER; and Case No.: 3:17-cv-02215-BEN-JLB 12 KIMBERLY GARNIER, FINDINGS OF FACT AND 13 Plaintiffs, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 14 v. 15 MICHELLE O’CONNOR-RATCLIFF; and THOMAS JOSEPH ZANE, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Dr. Christopher Garnier and Ms. Kimberly Garnier (collectively, 19 “Plaintiffs”) are parents of children in the Poway Unified School District (“PUSD”). 20 Defendants Ms. Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and Mr. Thomas Joseph Zane (collectively, 21 “Defendants”) are members of the PUSD Board of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API