Callaway v. Rolland Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
The defendant objects to plaintiff’s motion for the production and inspection of documents upon the several grounds, that good cause therefor does not appear; that, “the motion is so vague and indefinite and fails to designate the documents sought with reasonable particularity”; that, “all payroll records of L. E. Stice are requested although this person is not a party to this action”; and that “the information sought is not material,” etc.
It is to be noted that this is an action for wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., and it is averred…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Rendering Co. v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Rosseau v. LangleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Bordonaro Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
- Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1945
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958