Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 2, 2004No. 89,511PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marquardt, J.:

Following a jury trial, Edward B. Martin was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit identity theft and four counts of identity theft. On appeal, Martin challenges his sen*643tence. We vacate Martin’s sentence and remand the case to the trial court with directions.

Prior to trial, the State filed a motion for an upward dispositional departure sentence. The State notified the trial court that should Martin be convicted of the crimes, it wanted the jury to make, a special finding as to whether Martin was the “boss, ‘kingpin,’ organizer, [or] supervisor” of the identity theft…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GideonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. GradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Fletcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API