State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Marquardt, J.:
Following a jury trial, Edward B. Martin was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit identity theft and four counts of identity theft. On appeal, Martin challenges his sen*643tence. We vacate Martin’s sentence and remand the case to the trial court with directions.
Prior to trial, the State filed a motion for an upward dispositional departure sentence. The State notified the trial court that should Martin be convicted of the crimes, it wanted the jury to make, a special finding as to whether Martin was the “boss, ‘kingpin,’ organizer, [or] supervisor” of the identity theft…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GideonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. GradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Fletcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004