Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1977No. F-76-508 and F-76-509PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

Appellants, Robert Howard and Carolyn Ann Roe, hereinafter referred to as defendant Howard and defendant Roe, were jointly charged, tried and convicted in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-75-1146, for the offense of Robbery With Firearms, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp. 1974, § 801. The jury returned a verdict fixing the punishment of defendant Howard, who has two previous felony convictions, at fifty (50) years’ imprisonment; and, the punishment of defendant Roe at ten (10) years’ imprisonment. From said judgments and sentences each defendant has filed an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Frye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Sadler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Underwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API