In re City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by William 0. Arnold, property owner, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Bronx on the 5th day of March, 1914, confirming the final report of commissioners of estimate herein, as overrules his objections to the confirmation of said report and confirms the action of the commissioners in respect to the damage parcel owned by him.
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:
The commissioners reported that they had made “no award for damage to this parcel' for the reason that said buildings were erected subsequent to the establishment of the grade. ” The owner claimed damages by reason of the intended regulation of West One Hundred and Seventy-second street.
The map showing the established grade of West One Hundred and Seventy-second street was filed in the office of the register of the city and county of New York on December 17, 1895, and at about the same time in the other public offices wherein it was required by law to be filed. Thereafter, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Janes v. . DickeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In re Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty of the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- People ex rel. Bennett v. DickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- In e Vyse SteetNew York Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- People ex rel. Architects' Offices, Inc. v. OrmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Frontier Town Properties, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1968