Legal Opinion

Kleinert v. Knoop

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1907No. Docket No. 72PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw; Gage (William G.), J. Bill by William Kleinert against Charles Knoop, Henry F. Mertz, and Minnie Mertz to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Furstenberg Bros, petitioned for leave to intervene. From an order denying the petition, petitioners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

In proceedings undertaken to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, appellants, claiming to be lienors, and not having been made parties, asked for leave to intervene, setting out with their application a copy of the affidavit for lien and attached statement of account. Their application was denied, and from the order made they have appealed.

The objections come from the owners of the property, defendants, who claim that appellants’ petition and their affidavit for lien filed with the register of deeds are both defective. The defects in the affidavit which are pointed out are (1) that it cannot be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smalley v. Northwestern Terra-Cotta Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Daschke v. SchellenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Acme Lumber Co. v. Modern Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. J Altman Companies, Inc. v. Saginaw Plumbing and Heating Supply Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Kingman Mills v. FurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Crabtree v. Markham Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Ledbetter v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API