Lathrop v. Berryhill
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL JAMES LATHROP, 4:18-CV-04025-VLD Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; (DOCKET NO. 32) Defendant. Pending is Attorney Pfeiffer’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Docket Nos. 32 and 36). The government has not objected to the motion, but it has filed a response. See Docket No. 35. DISCUSSION A. Overview Mr. Lathrop’s petition for Social Security benefits was denied initially and at the reconsideration level. After the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tobias J. COTTER, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Goff v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1990