Legal Opinion

Lathrop v. Berryhill

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 8, 2020No. 4:18-cv-04025Unknown

1Opinion

DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL JAMES LATHROP, 4:18-CV-04025-VLD Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; (DOCKET NO. 32) Defendant. Pending is Attorney Pfeiffer’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Docket Nos. 32 and 36). The government has not objected to the motion, but it has filed a response. See Docket No. 35. DISCUSSION A. Overview Mr. Lathrop’s petition for Social Security benefits was denied initially and at the reconsideration level. After the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Tobias J. COTTER, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Goff v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API