Davis v. Falls
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The first assignment of error urged for reversal of the judgment is that the court-erred in admitting certain letters, purporting to have been written by Eugene Davis, to be read to the .jury. These letters were written in the fall of 1923, and the lease contract was executed in the fall of 1921. In both of the letters Davis recognized that his wife was liable on the rent notes. The letters were admissible as a declaration against the interest of Mrs. Davis. Jefferson v. Souter, 150 Ark. 55, 233 S. W. 804. They were also admissible as tending to show that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. EllenwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Barham v. Bank of DelightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Arkmo Lumber Co. v. CantrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Black v. HogsettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Neely v. RembertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Fort Smith v. BatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Hill v. TalbertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Mushrush v. DowningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Public Utilities Corp. of Ark. v. CardenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930