Legal Opinion

Hub Floral Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 31, 1976No. C.D. 4669; Court No. 71-9-01092PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WatsoN, Judge:

This case involves the classification of articles known as chenille stems, 12-inch lengths of flexible wire twisted around textile material in a manner which allows the textile fibers to • protrude prominently, giving the article a fuzzy caterpillar-like appearance. The chenille stems were classified as parts of artificial flowers,1 a classification which in the terms of the tariff schedules general interpretive rules presupposes that the use of these articles as parts of artificial flowers exceeds all other uses combined.2

*23Plaintiff argues for classification of the chenille…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flexible Plumber Tools, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Mitsui & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. Terra Firma Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API