Hub Floral Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
WatsoN, Judge:
This case involves the classification of articles known as chenille stems, 12-inch lengths of flexible wire twisted around textile material in a manner which allows the textile fibers to • protrude prominently, giving the article a fuzzy caterpillar-like appearance. The chenille stems were classified as parts of artificial flowers,1 a classification which in the terms of the tariff schedules general interpretive rules presupposes that the use of these articles as parts of artificial flowers exceeds all other uses combined.2
*23Plaintiff argues for classification of the chenille…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flexible Plumber Tools, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Mitsui & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Terra Firma Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980