United States v. Quintana-Perez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Upon review of the record and the briefs (including appellant’s pro se supplemental brief), we conclude that the facts and legal issues have been adequately presented and that the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C); 1st Cir. Loc. R. 34(a)(2)(C). Appellant pled guilty to two separate drug conspiracies. In connection with one of these charges (# 00-332), appellant stipulated to the applicable guidelines, including a 4-level leadership adjustment under § 3Bl.l(a), and to a 168-month recommended prison sentence. Accepting the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. RosalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Garcia-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SavareseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quintana-Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Quintana-Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Quintana-Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005