Legal Opinion

Chemex Distributors, Inc. v. Winslow

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 10, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.

Motion to dismiss counterclaim under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that it is not a proper counterclaim in the action.

*131The complaint alleges that the defendant made an agreement with one Vagg by which the latter was given the exclusive rights of representation and distribution in and for the city of Greater New York for the products manufactured and sold by the defendant and known as the Chemex fire extinguishers and Chemex powder. Thereafter the said Vagg assigned his rights under the contract to the plaintiff. The complaint then alleges that, prior to the acceptance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ter Kuile v. MaralandNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. O'Brien v. DwyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API